Hillary’s Democratic Presidential Nomination Win Was Statistically Impossible Without This Taking Place

fraudIronic isn’t it?

Stanford, the college from which Chelsea Clinton, the daughter of Hillary Clinton, graduated, conducted a research study of the 2016 Primary Election.

Their findings?

It’s basically a proven statistically impossibility that election fraud was not committed in helping Hillary win the nomination.

Yep, it’s true and irrefutable.

Thanks to widespread vote fraud, Hillary Clinton locked up the Democratic nomination for President.

Widespread allegations of election fraud and voter suppression across the United States during the 2016 Democratic Primary has sparked the interest of several academic researchers and what they discovered in their research is disturbing.

The researchers each performed independent studies in which a few different statistical was applied to analyze various subsets of vote data and of the studies came to the same conclusion.

Namely that Hillary’s win was could have only been possible a result of widespread election fraud.

In fact, one of the statistical models applied by Stanford University researcher Rodolfo Cortes Barragan to a subset of the data found that the probability of the “huge discrepancies” of which “nearly all are in favor of Hillary Clinton by a huge margin” was “statistically impossible” and that “the probability of this this happening was is 1 in 77 billion”.

Furthermore, the researchers found that the election fraud only occurred in places where the voting machines were hackable and that did not keep an paper trail of the ballots.

In these locations Hillary won by massive margins.

On the other hand, in locations that were not hackable and did keep paper trails of the ballots Bernie Sanders beat Hillary Clinton.

Analysis also showed repeatedly irregularities and statistically impossible reverses in reported live votes in several locations across the country.

In commenting on the research, Barragan stated that some of the models are rock solid and 59 years old and the results seen here have never been witnessed in non-fraudelent election during that time period.

What’s next for Hillary?

Simply fix one more election and she’s back living in The White House.

You may also like...