Reeling Clinton Campaign Sinks to Disgusting New Low

clintoncWhat lengths will Hillary Clinton go to win The White House?

We already know she’ll accept millions of dollars from nations with terrorist ties and oppressive regimes to build a campaign war chest.

We know she’ll lie under oath and to the media and public.

Now Hillary has no problem calling anyone who opposes her a racist:

Amid a deafening chorus calling for the closure of her corrupt foundation to stop bagging foreign cash for favors, embattled Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has decided to label 31 million people as racists, simply because they don’t agree with her:

The Clinton campaign attack ad targeting Donald Trump portrays Breitbart News employees and readers as racists, white supremacists, and members of the Ku Klux Klan.

The ad includes shots of men dressed in Ku Klux Klan robes followed by footage of crowded Trump rallies. One shot shows Stephen K. Bannon, who temporarily stepped down as executive chairman of Breitbart News, standing in front of a mural depicting the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

Last month, Breitbart News was read by a record 31 million people.

Hillary Clinton described KKK recruiter Robert Byrd as her “mentor.”

Make no mistake…

If Hillary Clinton is elected President, she will further divide this country.

She will lie, distort, manipulate and use race to gain and maintain power.

Playing the race card stops any and all discussion of the issues.

Calling someone racist who simply disagrees with your policies is the ultimate display of lack of leadership.

You may also like...

  • Stephen Paraski

    You or I would be in jail for disclosing National Security Secrets, by arrogantly using a private E Mail server (she blamed Coli Powell). Look at Snowden, in exile in Russia, and Manning in the slammer at Fort Leavenworth. But the rich and powerfull do what they please and f*ck the plebes. And you better believe that ia all we are to them.

  • ironbiker


  • Roxanne

    Race baiting is all these pond scum have!

    • bradlillmars

      Unfortunately it is very effective with Democrats and the Blacks.

      • used_to_be_a_liberal

        not for much longer

      • Roxanne

        True, but how do we reach and educate the illiterate and the hopelessly indoctrinated? We can only save the saveable as Herman Cain likes to say.

        • bradlillmars

          The change can only come from within the individual. Where are the thousands of successful black businessmen, celebrities, sports figures and other blacks that are millionaires and have made their level of success by the old fashion way of earning it. Why don’t they start coming out and telling the black community how they did it and show all that it can be done if you want it bad enough.

          Muliti-millionaires like Colin K set race relations back 150 years by their stupid comments about how America doesn’t treat blacks as equals.

      • ganderdavis

        Wasn’t it Hillary who claimed Obama played the race card on her when she ran agains’t him ??

  • Bob Taylor

    I sent mine do not expect an answer but if we all sent one….maybe.

    OK! For those who will take an active stand against Mrs. H. Clinton, first read this post to decide if you agree. If you do not agree then do nothing, but if you agree then copy this and demand your Representatives do something about it.

    This law, 18 US Code 2071 (b), is the law Mrs. H. Clinton violated while holding office as the United States Secretary of State. Here is the reading of the appropriate code section:


    “Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.”

    The whole paragraph has compound sentences: “The structure of a compound sentence sends certain messages to readers, no matter how you fill in the blanks. First, it tells readers that the sentence contains two relatively important ideas, each one deserving its own independent clause. Second, it tells readers that these two ideas are approximately equal in importance, since they are balanced as a pair. And third, it alerts readers to the relationship between the two ideas, depending on the connector. For example, and suggests that the two ideas are being added together, but indicates that they are being contrasted, and or tells us that they are alternatives. A semicolon suggests balance between two similar or sharply contrasting statements.”

    By following the rules of punctuation we can easily and accurately settle on the things she willfully did.

    First Mrs. Clinton did have custody of records, documents or other things (electronic documents). Next she did willfully and unlawfully conceal or destroy the same.

    So let’s break this down to her (Mrs. Clinton’s) actual actions pertaining to files that were considered work related. Mrs. Clinton did willfully and unlawfully initiate work related documents to be placed on her private computer. Mrs. Clinton did willfully and unlawfully allow work related documents to be removed or destroyed from her private computer. We could proceed further, however those two actions alone fulfill the requirements to be prosecuted under the law as shown in this document. Even if Mrs. Clinton is not fined under this title (18 US Code 2071 (b) or imprisoned, she is still disqualified (if found guilty) to hold any office under the United States as per the cited US Code. However, Mrs. Clinton has admitted and the FBI has stated she did in fact do these actions. You should take notice that “intent” is not mentioned in this section of the Code.

    Any person with the knowledge of and the authority to take legal action to implement this US Code against Mrs. H. Clinton and does not do so is guilty of dereliction of duty. If the legal action allowed and demanded by this US Code is not taken in a timely manner then action could be implied as “election tampering” which would give the President reason to intervene on behalf of Mrs. Clinton. A pardon usually cannot take place unless the person is first convicted of a federal crime but the President may have other options.